Saturday, February 8, 2025

MGG - 5.19a - HWYD - DISKSECURE

It's not really like I was doing anything that I was supposed to wasn't supposed to.  After all, even though I was primarily there as manager of the technical support department, given my research and background they had said that I should look into forms of security and antivirus protection for the company.  But, equally, let's face it: this really was more part of my ongoing reviews of antiviral products.

So this was a product that was new to me.  I don't think the company that had produced it had really researched the field of computer viruses very extensively.  The product said that it would protect against all computer viruses, and particularly computer viruses that were of the boot sector infector type.  It was software, so this might have been a little bit problematic.  However, others had done it before them.

One of the products that had done it before them, and extremely effectively, was DISKSECURE.  Not only was DISKSECURE extremely effective, but it was also free.  And, I knew the author.  I used disk secure on all of my own machines.  I had also installed it, for Gloria, at her workplace. DISKSECURE not only protected against computer viruses, and particularly the boot sector infector type, but it also allowed you to effectively password protect your computer, which was, generally speaking, not available with MS-DOS computers at the time.  The fact that we had used DISKSECURE to protect Gloria's computer allowed us to detect the fact that someone was trying to break into her computer after hours.

Anyway, I had installed DISKSECURE on my computer, at *my* office.  And, now I was trying out another antivirus product.

I installed the test antivirus product on my own computer.  And then, in order to make sure that it worked, I tried to infect the computer with a simple BSI virus.  And, lo and behold, the computer got infected.  The test antivirus product obviously didn't protect against boot sector infector viruses.  At least not the simple one that I tried first.  So, that was a black mark against it, and I got another (free) antivirus product to clean off the virus.

Only to find that the test antivirus product, which had not protected against the virus infection, now prevented the antivirus disinfector from cleaning the virus infection.

So, I tried to uninstall the test antivirus.  Only to find that, probably due to some corruption involved in the virus infection, the test antivirus could no longer be uninstalled.

So, to recap, at this point I had a computer with a an ineffective test antivirus product installed on it, which had not prevented an infection, so the computer was infected with a virus, but the test antivirus would not allow an antivirus disinfector to clean the virus off.

Fortunately, DISKSECURE had another trick up its sleeve.  One of the options that DISKSECURE gave you, when you installed it on your computer in the first place, was to create a backup copy of your boot sector.  And it also provided a function that would allow you to, in a fairly brute force fashion, use the backup copy of the boot sector to overwrite anything that had happened to the boot sector.  For example, a virus infection.

So I used this brute force overriding replacement to put the original boot sector back onto my computer.  And, lo and behold, the computer was clean, and uninfected, and I was back in business.  With a little extra cleaning up to do.

I immediately terminated the test antivirus, with extreme prejudice.  And, obviously, that particular antivirus product got a rather scathing review.  It was not recommended.

DISKSECURE, on the other hand, was extremely useful, in quite a variety of situations. I kept on using it quite extensively over the years.

Previous: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2024/05/mgg-519-hwyd-women-in-developmentfonts.html

Introduction and ToC: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2023/10/mgg-introduction.html

Next: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2024/06/mgg-520-hwyd-we-like-it-that-way.html

Friday, February 7, 2025

Sermon 56 - Situationally Unaware

Sermon 56 - Situationally Unaware


Matthew 24:50

The master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he is not aware of.


Psalm 65:8

The whole earth is filled with awe at your wonders; where morning dawns, where evening fades, you call forth songs of joy.


Military and law enforcement people talk a lot about situational awareness.  Working in security, we get to hear about it too.  The main concept of situational awareness is that you are aware of your environment, and particularly the threats and the risks in your environment.  Being situationally aware, you pay attention to the environment, and what in the environment is a risk, or what in the environment may become a threat.  You also pay attention to any changes in the environment, changes that might introduce a threat or a risk into the environment.  Being aware of the risks you can then do a risk analysis, and manage the risks and not be vulnerable particularly vulnerable to any threats.

This is a concept, as I say, that comes primarily from the military, and has been passed down to law enforcement, and then has come to us in security.  But, as I frequently say, an awful lot of security is simply risk management, and the management of any business involves two things; management of risk, and management of people.  This applies to life as well, so the idea of situational awareness is something that more people should be aware of.

As I have mentioned, I am the only pedestrian in Port Alberni.  And, as I have also mentioned, the drivers in Port Alberni are the worst in the entire world.  And, having studied the situation, at close range (sometimes literally), I think I have figured out what the problem is.  As I say, the drivers of Port Alberni are the worst in the entire world.  I have taught all over the world.  I have taught on six continents.  I have seen lots of drivers, in lots of places, with lots of different characteristics.  There are places in the world that have faster drivers.  There are places in the world that have more *aggressive* drivers.  But there is no place that I have ever been, in the entire world, where the drivers are more situationally unaware than in Port Alberni.  When driving, you have to pay attention to things that are outside the windows of your car.

So, the concept of situational awareness applies to life.  It applies to different aspects of life.  Situational awareness obviously applies to driving.  But situational awareness also applies to us in the church.

So, in respect of the Christian life, of what is it that we have to be situationally aware?  Well, not to put a point on it to find a point on it, everything.  Everything, and even more so.  We have to be aware of everything in our lives that we would normally be aware of, and some additional factors as well.

We are in this world.  We may not be of it, but we are definitely in it.  God has created the world for us to be in.  God has created us, and the world, and the entire universe, and any other universes that there may be.  And, because God created them, God must have had a purpose in creating them.  So everything that happens in our life is something that we have to be aware of.  The Bible, very often, talks about seeing God in the works of his hands: in the works of nature, in the stars in the sky, in the heavens above us, in all of the landscape that is around us, and all of the beasts that walk upon it, or crawl upon it, or fly over it.  God created all of them.  And God had a purpose in creating them.  And God may be speaking to us, through them.  So we need to listen to God.  And part of the way that we listen to God is by being aware of what is around us.  Because he created it.

That isn't the only way that God speaks to us, of course.  God speaks to us most directly, and most reliably, in his word: the Bible.  So, in addition to everything that is around us, we need to be aware of what the Bible says about it all.  How often are we aware of what the Bible says?  Of what God says to us, everyday, written down, in a kind of an owner's manual for the universe, if only we would read it.

Sometimes, of course, God has a specific verse, just for us, speaking to us and to our situation, as if God was speaking directly to us.  It just pops into our mind, and it directly addresses the situation that we are facing.  God is directing us.  But, of course, it doesn't just pop into our mind.  It pops into our awareness, out of our memory.  But we only remember it, if we have read it in the first place.  How often do we read the Bible?

Well, of course, we are all busy.  And we may not have time to take an evening off, every week, to go to a Bible study, where the Bible study might discuss possibly four or five verses out of the tens of thousands of verses in the Bible.  And of course, there is the preparation time to get ready for the Bible study, and then there is the time driving to the Bible study, and then there's the time for the study itself, and then, of course, there is the necessary socialization time.  So, yes, it might not be a completely efficient is of our time to spend two or three hours, per week, delving into four or five verses of scripture.

But, then again, it's awfully hard to find any justification in the Bible that indicates that God is at all interested in efficiency.

But, if you want efficiency, there is more than one way to read the Bible.

It's quite possible just to read it.

I recently had a conversation with a young parishioner in one of the churches in town.  She told me that it was her ambition to read the Bible all the way through.  It's a good ambition.  And I gave her a few tips.  I told her that you can buy One Year Bibles.  I know that these Bibles exist in at least two translations, the New International Version, and the Good News Bible.  I know that, because I have both of them.  And, with those One Year Bibles, you get a bit of the Old Testament, and a bit of the gospels, and a bit of the epistles, and a bit out of the Psalms, everyday.  You get a bit of a mix, so that you're not faced with chapters upon chapters of Jewish dietary law, all at one go, but you get to read through the entire Bible in one year.  In one year, you can read through the complete Bible.

In fact, you don't need one of the One Year Bibles.  If you read four chapters, every day, you can get through the entire Bible, in possibly just a little over a year.  If you read five chapters, every day, you will get through the entire Bible in slightly less than a year.  If you read ten chapters, every day, you will get through the entire Bible in five months.  And reading ten chapters, everyday, generally will take you less than half an hour.  Okay, if you are into Jeremiah, Jeremiah has fairly long chapters, and he and Isaiah, well ten chapters of them might occasionally edge you over the half hour limit.  Even so, when you get into the Psalms, ten Psalms might only take you ten minutes.  (Well, OK, except for Psalm 119.  But then, Psalm *117* is the *shortest* chapter in the Bible.)  So, on average, about twenty minutes a day will get you through the entire Bible in five months.

And then what?

Well, I just start all over again at Genesis.  It's funny: every time I read the Bible I come across a verse that I don't recall ever having read before.  Every time I read the Bible, even though I have read it over more than twenty times, I find something that sounds new.  And that speaks to me.  In my particular situation.  You'd think that, by this time, I would have memorized the darned thing.  But apparently not.

So, the Bible is something else of which we should be aware.  And aware of on an ongoing basis.

And there are other things of which we should be aware.  Possibly not things that we should build into, but we should be aware of the possibilities.  The Bible speaks of powers that are ranged against us.  That is, if we are on God's side.  There are powers that are ranged against God.  If we are for God, those powers are ranged against us.  Those powers fight against us.  Now, this is definitely not an area of expertise for me.  It's not even in an area in which I am interested.  After all, the Bible also says that we should not be too terribly interested in these powers.  We should not serve them, and nor should we ask them for help.  We should not call them up.  We should not be associated with people who try to call up those powers.  C.S. Lewis, in "The Screwtape Letters," notes that there are two mistakes that people make with respect to the Devil: the first mistake is that people are too afraid of the Devil.  After all, we do have God on our side.  Or, rather, we are on God's side, and God takes care of his own.  The other mistake that people make is to become too interested in the Devil.  So, no, I have not studied in this area, and I do not recommend that you study it, either.  It is an area fraught with peril.  And that peril is not merely physical, but spiritual.  But the Bible does say that these powers exist.  In fact, it mentions that these powers exist, and warns us against them, many more times then it mentions homosexuality, or abortion.  Combined.  So, it would be foolish not to be aware of the possibility.  Not terrified by it.  The Bible does not provide us with details, and God probably has a reason for that.  But we should be aware of the possibility: not terrified, and not too terribly interested.  But aware.

One more thing of which to be aware: you.  What do you need?  What drives you?  What do you want?  Why do you do the things that you do?  No, you can't just copp out and, with Paul, say, "wretched man that I am!"  Be aware of what traps and triggers you.  Be aware of what builds and fulfills you, and "think on these things."  We seem to go to great lengths *not* to be aware of ourselves.  We aren't supposed to think about ourselves.  That's selfish, and selfishness is bad!  Therefore, we reject thinking about ourselves.  But God thinks about you.  God loves you.  So, while trying not to go *too* far down the path of self-centredness, maybe you can try and see yourself as God sees you?  Something, some*one*, to be loved, and protected--and trained up in the way we should go.

Be aware of everything around us, even mundane things, which don't seem to be spiritual, but which may be.  For example, when we find that someone is in distress, the right thing to do is always to help them, if we possibly can.  "If we possibly can" covers a lot of ground.  So, anytime we see that someone is behaving oddly, even just seeing that someone is behaving oddly may indicate that they are in distress.  Maybe we can help.  Even just listening to their distress can help.  Be aware of these opportunities that God is giving you.  All too often we are busy, or find this person annoying, or this person just doesn't fit with our particular preferred life.  And so we decide to make ourselves situationally *un*aware.  We decide to deliberately ignore what God is showing us.  Because what God is showing us is an opportunity to help.  But it also means that it takes away our time that we would much prefer to spend watching television, or going out for a meal, or chatting with a friend, who isn't in distress, and so our chat is unlikely to demand anything of us.  And we can get off by saying well, we didn't know!  And there's a verse about that, in Proverbs ...


https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2023/09/sermons.html

Thursday, February 6, 2025

MGG - 6.14 - Gloria - Webmastery

Gloria always considered herself as not very knowledgeable about computers.  That was because she was always comparing herself to me.  In comparison to pretty much all of her co-workers, in all the various jobs that she had; in education, in industry, in government, and in business; Gloria, in whatever office she was working, very quickly became the person to go to for help with computer operations.

Even before she met me, Gloria was the person who determined the new computer that was to be purchased for Regent College.  She was the one who specified what was needed, and she was the one who had final refusal over the various proposals from vendors.

At one point Gloria was approached by an assistant manager, who noted that he had just deleted all of the boilerplate files that the staff were used to using as templates.  Gloria informed him that she was pretty certain that those files could not be recovered, because of the process that he had followed in doing the deletion.  Gloria, to double check, contacted me, relayed the process that had been followed, and I confirmed that, yes, she was absolutely correct, there was nothing that could be done: those files were gone.  Subsequently, the assistant manager came back to Gloria, and said that he had found a workaround.  He had found a listing of recently used files in one of the programs, and they would simply use those.  Gloria explained, as gently as she could, that that list was simply a list of pointers, and did not mean that those files were, in fact, still available.  (Gloria checked with me about that, as well, and I confirmed that she was absolutely correct.)

But what I, personally, found most impressive was that Gloria was asked, by the Vancouver Women's Musical Society, to take on the society's website.  The board felt that all that needed to be done was to keep the website up to date, by entering new information as it became available, and therefore this was simply a clerical function.  In fact, what they had asked for her to be, was their webmaster (or webmistress), and that this was a fairly technical undertaking.

I worked with Gloria on her initial review of the site.  Gloria was concerned about the different font sizes, font typefaces, and font colors, that had been entered into the site over a number of years.  An awful lot of the extraneous font information have resulted from people simply copy and pasting from MS Word documents, directly into the website.  The web content management system had tried valiantly to make sense of all of this material, but nobody had ever either planned what the website should look like, or looked at what was happening as they simply threw pieces of documents into the web pages.

In order to show Gloria what had happened, I taught her how to use the HTML editor (HyperText Markup Language, the building block of the Web), and taught her what some of the HTML meant.

Gloria had always loved the Word Perfect word processor.  She loved the control that it gave you, and the fact that when you turned on a printing or publishing feature, you had to turn it off again.  She took to HTML right away, loving it because of the same mindset behind it: when you turned on a change, you had to turn it off again again.  Logical.  She loved the control that gave her, and very quickly realized what she had to do to clean up all the hundreds of old, extraneous, redundant font commands that were buried in the HTML and all of the various web pages.  She became, essentially, a web developer.  She knew more about HTML, and could use it better, then an awful lot of the web developers who style themselves as such.


Previous: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2025/02/mgg-613-gloria-hand.html

Introduction and ToC: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2023/10/mgg-introduction.html

Next: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2025/02/mgg-615-gloria-infamous-pink-binder.html

Wednesday, February 5, 2025

Last place

It is not necessarily true that you always find what you are looking for in the last place you look.

The usual explanation of this truism is that when you find what you are looking for, you stop looking.

The thing is, you can look everywhere and still not find what you need.

Tuesday, February 4, 2025

Sermon 57 - Leaven

Sermon 57 - Leaven

Matthew 13:33

He told them still another parable: "The kingdom of heaven is like yeast that a woman took and mixed into about sixty pounds of flour until it worked all through the dough."

Hebrews 4:10

God rested from his work.  Those who enjoy God’s rest also rest from their works.


It was communion Sunday.  He said he was going to preach on communion, and on bread.

I am always disappointed when someone says that they are going to preach a sermon on communion.  And particularly when they say that they are going to preach about bread.  I always get excited when that is announced, because it is an opportunity to talk about yeast.  And then they never do.  I don't know whether this is because ministers are, generally speaking, men, and therefore don't bake.  Or whether it's because most ministers went to theological school, and didn't study anything about biochemistry.  Whatever the cause, talking about bread, and talking about communion, is an opportunity to talk about one of the most interesting things that God has given us, and then they never do.

We use yeast to make bread.  Bread is pretty universal as a foodstuff.  Almost (but not quite) all cultures have come up with some kind of bread.  We say that Jesus is the Bread of Life, referring to how necessary he is for our life.

Yeast is used to make bread rise.  Bread is, basically, a structure of membranes of the cooked bread dough, surrounding holes that mean that the bread is tastier, and also easier to eat.  But there are ways to make bread without yeast.  There is, for example, egg bread, where the holes are essentially made physically.  You beat eggs into a froth, the froth has holes, and you mix the froth and the dry ingredients together.  We can make soda bread, in the same way we make cakes, not using yeast.  We use baking powder, a chemical which, when wet, and heated, releases carbon dioxide and making bubbles.

The rising, in both bread and cakes, is due to carbon dioxide.  But the processes are quite different. Yeast is, when it's been reconstituted with water, and given a little sugar, and warmed up, living.  Baking powder is just a chemical.  If you keep it, sealed tightly enough, in the cupboard, it will never go bad.  If some moisture gets in there, it will probably release the carbon dioxide, and so it's not going to be as effective, but it'll never go bad.  It'll never grow mold.  It can't.  Mold can't live on it.  There's nothing there for the mold to eat.  Just a chemical, that's going to release carbon dioxide if it gets wet.

But yeast is different.  Yeast, in the right situation, is living.  Which gives a rise to the joke: what's the difference between Port Alberni and sourdough?  Sourdough has live culture.

But I'm getting ahead of myself.

Yeast is a type of fungus.  Fungi are pretty great.  They give us tasty and nutritious things, like mushrooms, and they give us really bad things, like black mold.  (Actually, I guess some of the mushrooms can be pretty bad as well.  As Terry Pratchett said, all mushrooms are edible.  *Some* mushrooms are only edible *once*.)

Actually, yeast isn't just one thing.  It's not one species of organism.  It's a whole family of organisms that do pretty much the same thing.  As a matter of fact, there are quite a few different organisms that can be used as a leavening agent.  The yeast that you buy in jars, or in envelopes, just happens to be a particularly convenient variety.  It's a variety that eats, and produces carbon dioxide, at a particularly fast rate.  And it's also a variety that you can dry out, and store,  and conveniently transport, and sell in those little envelopes which will stay viable for a number of years even stored in your kitchen cupboard.  But it's not the only type of yeast.

And in fact, when we were talking about communion, the wine is also a product of a very similar process.  It's probably a different type of yeast.  As a matter of fact, different types of yeast get used in making different types of beer.  Different varieties of yeast will give beer a slightly different flavor.  It's possibly similar in wine.  A lot of different factors go into making beer, and a lot of different factors go into making wine.  And, in fact, depending on the process that you use, sometimes you let the carbon dioxide build up in the wine, as it is fermenting, so that it carbonates the liquid.  This is how you get sparkling wines, and champagne.  So, yeast is involved in both of the elements in communion.

(Unless, that is, you are a Baptist, like I am.  We, of course, don't use wine.  An awful lot of Baptist Churches have, mostly in the past, frowned upon the use of alcohol in any form.  So we tend to use grape juice.  And, now, there is a tremendous theological issue among Baptist churches, since Welsh's Grape Juice is no longer available.  What the heck are we going to do for communion now?)

But let's get back to the bread.  The leaven, that is mentioned in the Bible, was not of the dry, packaged in little envelopes, type of yeast.  Not that that type of yeast couldn't have been included in the mix: it probably was.  But the leaven that is talked about, particularly in the Old Testament; the leaven that is used as an illustration of corruption; is probably an awful lot closer to what we now know as sourdough.

I worked with sourdough for many years.  Recently, an awful lot of people have started experimenting with it.  Lots of people started sourdough cultures, and experimented with it, during the pandemic.  An awful lot of people did a lot of fancier cooking than they would normally be used to, because there was nothing else to do, and everybody had to stay home.  So, they started experimenting with different types of cooking.  And, a lot of people started experimenting with sourdough culture.  You can start your own sourdough culture.  You just mix up some flour and water, or flour and milk and water, and leave it exposed to the open air for a while, and, hoping that it doesn't actually grow visible mold on it, you then cover it up, and let it start fermenting, and bubbling, and increasing away.  It is possible to do this.  Spores of yeast drift around in the dust in the air.  Number Two Daughter did it.  The thing is, it takes a while.  It takes a while for the population, of different types of yeast, to settle in on the optimal variety that will, number one, raise your bread, number two, not grow visible mold, and number three, raise your bread quickly when you need it, and grow enough in the few days between when you make loaves of bread.

Just as a side issue, it's probably easier to get sourdough culture from somebody else.  At least, as long as you're not all locked up in your own houses, during a pandemic, and you can go and get sourdough culture from somebody else who's got some.  But even at that, your culture is probably not the same as the sourdough culture even from the person that you got it from.  It depends how often you make bread, it depends on whether you are making bread, or biscuits, or pancakes, and it depends what type of flour you use, and whether you add milk to your culture, and a few things like that.  You are going to get used to using sourdough culture, but the culture, itself, is going to get used to you.  The population of yeast in your culture is going to be a population that is best suited to the way you use the sourdough culture.

There is another aspect to bread.  This aspect doesn't refer to unleavened bread, because it refers to the bread rising.  But then, we've been talking about yeast, and leaven, so far.

When you are making bread, you mix it into a dough.  And then you beat, and fold, and stretch, and pull, and fold over, and beat down the lump of dough.  Bread making, if you have a sufficiently strong table to really work at it, is excellent therapy if you are angry.  You can imagine that the lump of dough is the person, or the problem, that is distressing you.  You can just beat the ... well you can beat, and roll over, and fold, and squish the dough as much as you like.  You cannot over-beat bread dough.  The more you beat it, the more the proteins in the flour mix together into chains.  Those chains make the thin membranes of bread that cover the holes that the carbon dioxide generates, stronger and more able to withstand the rising and the baking process.  If the bread dough membranes are not strong enough, then the membranes will break, and you will have bread which, instead of having lots of little holes in it, has a few very large holes in it.  This has to do with physics and something called surface tension.  And because it has to do with physics, almost none of you will be interested in it.  But it's a fact, just like the fact that the more you beat the bread dough, the better the end result bread is.

Anyway, when you have sufficiently worked out your frustrations, or when you are just plain tired of beating up the bread dough, you cover it, and you let it rise.  This period of rising is known as resting.  And I recently saw a meme, traveling around the Internet, as memes do, and it said this about the term "resting" as used to describe bread when it is in this resting and rising phase.  If you want light bread, you let it rest.  For quite a long time.  Generally at least a few, and sometimes several, hours.  And so, this person said, when it looks like they are doing nothing, and that they are just resting, that they are, in fact, bread.  And bread is better for a good, long rest.

And that is something that we should sometimes remember: we have to rest, to rise.

And, having pointed out all of this, I have to admit that none of this is relevant to the bread that was actually used at the Last Supper.  Because the Last Supper was at Passover, and at Passover they ate unleavened bread.

The story of the Exodus tells us that the Israelites had to leave in a hurry, and their bread hadn't had time to rise.  But there is another aspect to yeast, or sourdough, or leaven that is a theological point, and that has given rise to the modern tradition, as Passover, of having a game where the children search all over the house trying to find any yeast, and making sure that it is discarded or destroyed.

Yeast, as I said, is a fungus.  It is a living organism.  If you have sourdough culture you have to make sure you use it, and feed it, regularly, because it is alive.  And, because yeast is a fungus, some varieties of it can cause infections and other problems.

Because of all of this, leaven, in the Old Testament, became a symbol of corruption.  This is probably why Jesus warned against the leaven of the Pharisees.  They had corrupted the intentions of God's Law.

Jesus also used this in a different illustration.  And, like He so often did, He turned the idea upside down.  He said that the Kingdom of Heaven was like yeast.

Just think about that for a second.  Think about it the way a Jew in the first century would have heard it.  What do you mean that this symbol of corruption is the Kingdom of Heaven?  Are you saying that God is corrupt?

And Jesus goes on to show what leaven does.  It's alive.  If you put it, even a small amount, into a huge pile of flour, it is going to start eating that flour.  And growing.  Until the whole pile is just one huge pile of leaven.

The point being that God's message is not just a story printed in words on a page.  It's alive!  If you let it, it will take this dead pile of cereal dust, and turn it into a living force.

OK, you can go for lunch, now.  Have some bread.  And think about it.

Monday, February 3, 2025

MGG - 6.13 - Gloria - hand

I watched WALL-E again last night.  It's being a while.  Gloria and I enjoyed it and watched it multiple times.

Unfortunately, the copy that I got from the library here, in common with a great many library copies of children's DVDs, has frequently being taken out, dropped, and probably even stepped on.  The surface is a haze of scratches, and quite a number of them are extensive enough that a great many sections of the movie are just not available.  I'll probably have to go around to the second hand stores here and see if I can find a copy.

I've always liked WALL-E.  It's a romantic comedy, and one of the few "situation" comedies where the situation is extreme enough for the humour to actually rely on the situation, and not the foolishness of the characters.  And it's also refreshing that all of the characters (with the exception of Auto) are, essentially, good (and even Auto is not so much evil, as limited).

I like the love story.  The fact that the beautiful, capable robot falls for the lumpy and aged trash collector resonates.  So does the tenderness with which he cares for her during her hibernation (and which she eventually discovers).

I hadn't, in a sense, forgotten the hand holding, but I had forgotten how extensive, and important, it was to, and in, the movie.

Hand holding was oddly important to Gloria and I.  In the first place I had never had a girlfriend, and had never had anyone to hold hands with.  In the second place, I discovered that I was a very tactile person, a fact which had been hidden by growing up in a very non-tactile family.  Gloria used to say about the early days of our marriage that I held her hand so much that it was like I was afraid of her getting away.  We held hands a lot, and probably a lot more than most couples.  One counselor remarked to us that it was obvious that there was nothing wrong with our relationship, and when we queried why it was so obvious, she just noted that, every time we were in her office, we were always holding hands.  We held hands in the car, when I was driving, and while I don't like driving, and get frustrated by it, and Gloria while Gloria was occasionally nervous by how aggressive that I got in those situations, she eventually found that simply touching my hand meant that I calmed down, and started driving more rationally.

So holding hands was very important to us.  And in Gloria's final days in hospital, I held her hand a lot.

And I don't have anyone to hold hands with anymore.

Previous: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2025/01/mgg-612-gloria-editor.html

Introduction and ToC: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2023/10/mgg-introduction.html

Next: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2025/02/mgg-614-gloria-webmastery.html

Saturday, February 1, 2025

Government versus business

Javier Milei has famously said that his contempt for the state is infinite.  A great number of populist politicians, in recent days, would probably say something along the same lines. This is one of the standard tenets of conservative, or right-wing, politics: government is best which governs least.  The idea is that government is inefficient, and should be minimal, at best, in order to allow for business to maximize productivity, and therefore, in theory, prosperity for everyone.

As a security professional, I know that this principle, while appealing to very many, needs to have serious limits placed upon it.

For a number of years I held the certification known as the Certified Information Systems Security Professional.  As professionals, of course, we are primarily involved in supporting business.  After all, very few individuals can afford to hire us, and so the people who pay us are businesses, and therefore, we owe some fealty to the hand that feeds us.  But there is that troublesome mention of security.

Those of us in security, and particularly those of us who hold the certification, know about the security triad.  These are the three pillars of security.  They are not universally acknowledged, nor are they complete.  But it is an important principle to understand about security.  Security consists of multiple components, some of which are inherently in conflict with each other.

The triad is officially designated as confidentiality, integrity, and availability.  Confidentiality and integrity are, primarily, about control.  Businesses like control.  So they concentrate on confidentiality and integrity, and especially confidentiality.  But there is that troublesome mention of availability.  Now, to a certain extent, availability is about control.  Or, rather, it is about *pretending* to control things that you actually cannot control.  You cannot plan for disasters.  At least not completely.  You can plan to have systems and tools in place to enable you to weather some kind of storm, or to wait out a disaster.  But you very seldom know when that disaster is actually going to happen.  We do not actually have control of these things.  We just pretend that we do.

But, the thing is, that discussion of availability, and the ability to be resilient in the face of some kind of disaster, almost inevitably brings up the topic of safety.

Safety, very much like privacy, is actually a pretty nebulous concept.  One person's safety is another person's unwarranted interference.  But, the thing is, governments are not in the business of, well, business.  Governments are in the business of safety.  Governments are there to keep us, all of us, safe.  Governments are in the business of keeping us safe even from government.  And certainly from other governments.  Governments are in the business of keeping us safe from people who think that they should be able to lord it over us, or take things that we consider ours, or attack us, or even take our lives.  That is the purpose of government: to keep us safe.

And, as those of us who have seriously worked on this issue of availability, or business continuity planning (as the businesses tend to look at it), or emergency management (as the government specialists tend to look at it), at any rate as all of us who study this field, whatever it may be called, know that resilience is inefficient.  As a matter of fact, efficiency, which capital is businesses prize above everything else, is antithetical to resilience.

As evidence of this fact, I offer you the pandemic.  For decades, or even centuries, businesses have been pursuing capitalist ideals, and productivity, and efficiency, above pretty much everything else.  And then along came the pandemic, which pointed out, in rather drastic terms, that efficient systems are fragile.  When you have a completely efficient system, if something goes wrong, if anything goes wrong, then the whole system just collapses.

It's efficient, but it isn't safe.