MGG - 5.51a - HWYD - Positive

Both the RCMP and ICBC want us to track "positives."  A positive is a compliment, or a positive comment, or even a wave and possibly a smile, that members of the general public give us while we are out on shift.  This allows both the RCMP and ICBC to track the public's general perception of the program, and therefore, partially, the possibilities for its success in changing driving behavior.

So, while we are out on shift, we dutifully track "positives."  Tracking the positives also forces us to pay attention to them, and, I suppose, also helps to reinforce us in the perception that our work, as volunteers, is worthwhile and valuable.  (I suppose that this is a point to be added to my series on motivations for managing volunteer staff.)

In addition to positives, we are quite well aware that we get some "negatives."  There are some people who don't wave the whole hand at us, but only one particular finger.  There are those who shout abuse at us as we are on shift by the side of the road.  (I suppose that I shouldn't point out to strongly that, while we generally get the gist of the tone of the message that they are trying to send, very often on a noisy street soundscape, we simply can't hear whatever words they are shouting.)  Then there are those who stop for a chat, and try to convince us that it is illegal for us to note license plate numbers and other information.  These people seem to belong to the sovereign citizen movement, which doesn't seem to have any strong legal or constitutional background or political theory behind it, but is more driven by the hypothesis contained within the statement "freedumb means I can do anything I [expletive deleted] well please and nobody is allowed to make any rules about it."

We are well familiar with these negatives.  I suppose, having discussed the issue elsewhere that I need not stress too strongly that we, as volunteers, consider that we are doing the community a service, and sometimes even saving lives, and so we tend not to spend very much time thinking about the fit of pique displayed by one of these individuals.

In any case, today we were out doing a distracted driving check.  This is primarily about ensuring that people aren't actually talking on their cell phones while they are driving, but it also includes things like whether they are drinking while driving, or eating a hamburger while driving (sometimes holding the hamburger with both hands, which raises the question, who is actually driving the car?), or having an overly affectionate dog on your lap while driving.

There is one particular intersection in the city where we frequently set up a distracted driving check.  This one particular intersection is the place you are most likely to encounter an actual conversation with the occupants of cars.  When the light turns red and a car stops right where we are standing, surprisingly frequently, the window may roll down, and the driver start up a conversation with you, usually starting with, "What are you guys doing here?"

So today we had had a few similar conversations.  And then one particular car rolled up, and stopped, and the window rolled down, and the driver turned a very sour face upon us.  I must admit that I was rather preparing myself for one of the usual sovereign citizen blasts.  And he started out with a very grim, "What are you guys doing here?"  So I answered that we were checking for people who were talking on their cell phone while driving.  He got a look of withering disgust on his face, and I braced myself for one of the sovereign citizen diatribes.  He started off with, "Well, [expletive deleted] that!"

I was pretty certain, by this point, that we were going to get a negative blast.  But, almost immediately, although still with the incredibly sour look on his face, he said, "Good for you!"  And made a thumbs up gesture.  And added, "Keep it up!"  And the light changed to green, and he took off.

So, we counted that as a positive.  Although it was one of the *weirdest* positives I have ever encountered ...

Previous: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2024/12/mgg-551-hwyd-community-policing.html

Introduction and ToC: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2023/10/mgg-introduction.html

Next: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2025/02/mgg-552-hwyd-555-1212.html

MGG - 6.06a - Gloria - Business Continuity Planning

Okay, this may seem to be misplaced a bit, since, when we got married, I had not yet started my research even into computer viruses and malware, let alone the broader field of information security as a whole.

When Gloria and I got married, it was still possible to have a "Church" wedding, without the government being involved until after the fact.  At that time, the church could simply publish the banns (which basically just meant announcing the fact of the upcoming wedding) three times, over a period of a month, before the wedding took place.  Then, *after* the wedding took place, the church would inform the department of vital statistics that the couple had gotten married, with date, time, witnesses, and other necessary details.

Gloria and I, being staunch and long time church people, decided to have a Church wedding.  And the Church got into the process of reading the banns.

But Gloria, as mentioned elsewhere, had been a wedding hostess.  She was quite well aware of all of the possible problems that could occur during a wedding, and *particularly* the ones that would prevent a wedding from taking place.  She suggested to me that we get a marriage license anyway.  I thought that was a reasonable idea, and went and got one.  We didn't tell anybody about it.

The church read the banns for the first time.  And, a week or so later, they read the banns for the second time. Reading of the banns, as mentioned, simply means that you announce the upcoming wedding during a regular worship service.  (The term "banns" probably simply refers to the fact that the announcement includes the "if anyone knows any just cause why these two should not" et cetera.)

And then came the last Sunday before our wedding.  So this was the last chance to read the banns for a third time.  They didn't read the banns at the morning service.  But, this church had an evening service as well.  So we dutifully went along to the evening service, whereupon they didn't read the banns then either.

So, once the service was over, we mentioned, to the church administrator, that they had not read our banns for the third time.  That they had read the banns twice, in previous services, but they hadn't read them the third time.

This created some consternation.  As mentioned elsewhere, our wedding was a big wedding.  It was a big event in our denomination.  As a matter of fact, it was a bit of a an event even beyond our denomination.  So it was going to be pretty embarrassing, if announcements had to be made, and all kinds of arrangements had to be rearranged, if we could not be married on the date that had been, quite widely, announced.

All kinds of ideas were thrown around.  There was even talk of pretending that the regular Wednesday night prayer meeting be designated as a worship service, somehow.  All kinds of ideas were raised, and then shot down, as unworkable.

I must admit that Gloria and I let all of this go on for possibly longer than we needed to before we admitted the fact that, anticipating just such a problem, we had, in fact, previously procured a valid marriage license.

Previous: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2025/01/mgg-606-gloria-wedding-planner.html

Introduction and ToC: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2023/10/mgg-introduction.html

Next: https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2025/01/mgg-607-gloria-who-are-you-again.html

Not Hallmark, but ...

Wasting time, this time with one of the Superchannel productions that are, if at all possible, even *worse* than Hallmark movies, I was startled by a line that became a bit of a tagline, and even important to the plot (if these things actually have any plots).  This character says "if a woman makes you want to jump into water, you love her."

No, this line is not exactly profound.

The thing is, in one of the earliest times that I can remember meeting Gloria, I jumped off the Keats dock (fully clothed), as a kind of a goodbye sendoff for the Women's Retreat.

(see also https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2024/07/profundity-from-hallmark-movie.html ,

https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2024/11/another-one.html , and https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2025/07/another-hallmark-one.html )

Review of "How to Train Your Dragon," 2025 CGI version

Yes, many animated movies are now being redone in "live action," with photorealistic CGI.  In the case of "How to Train Your Dragon, I kind of wondered what was the point, since the animated version was relatively recent anyway.

Overall, the translation does hold up well.  Using live actors does allow for more subtle nuance in what is, after all, an emotionally complicated story.

There is, however, one caveat.  The use of real landscapes and CGI "dragons" does, often, strain credibility with the physics of various scenes, and sometimes only serves to point out the problems with scale and distance that the original, somewhat cruder animation, hides.

Vibe coding

I *love* this ad.  I mean, it's for a recruiter, and a gig economy one at that, but even so, it says all kinds of things about genAI tools that just ring so true.  "[A] no-code world that's too good to be true."  "[J]ust not tested through."  "I don't care about bugs."  "I don't need a backend if I've got the spark."

Non-kosher potatoes?

Potatoes get a bad rap from the "no carbs" diet crowd.  Potatoes are actually amazingly nutritious.  (The "Potato Famine" in Ireland was so bad not simply because of monoculture, a new pathogen, and amazingly short-sighted forced migrations, but because the *introduction* of the potato to Ireland allowed the populations to balloon ten times over in a very short time.)

So it is interesting to note a new study which indicates that tomatoes may be a genetic ancestor of potatoes.  Particularly in light of the fact that almost everyone eats the french fired version of potato chips (not crisps) dunked or covered in ketchup.

However, this may create a new problem for those seriously following the tenets of the Jewish faith.  There is that statement about "thou shalt not seethe a kid in its mother's milk," which has developed into a prohibition against cheeseburgers.  (You can't have meat and dairy in the same dish.)  Given this same logic, ketchup on chips no longer seems to be kosher ...

Another (Hallmark) one?

"I brought the least trusting person I know to a place where nothing can be trusted."

 - "Believe in Christmas"

(see also https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2024/07/profundity-from-hallmark-movie.html , https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2025/08/not-hallmark-but.html ,

and https://fibrecookery.blogspot.com/2024/11/another-one.html )